Lenovo Thinkpad vs Ideapad : Which is best for you in 2022

The Thinkpad and the Ideapad are two of Lenovo's top of the line models. This is nothing unexpected, as they're both able laptops with a great deal to offer. Yet, for some, individuals looking for a laptop, it tends to be extremely challenging to know the distinctions between the two.

With the Thinkpad being a robust of the laptop world since the 90s, the Ideapad range is a much fresher plan, and is minimal over 10 years old. Yet, obviously, fresher really means worse.

So on the off chance that you're hoping to discover the contrast between the two series of laptops, then, at that point, you're perfectly positioned. How about we investigate the two and perceive how they vary.

Lenovo Thinkpad vs Ideapad

To clarify the distinction between the two basically, the Lenovo Thinkpad is planned in light of the business client, while the Ideapad is made for the normal regular shopper.

Lenovo are one of the greatest selling brands in this present reality. The Chinese organization has gone from one solidarity to another, taking on the American monsters in Dell and HP.

With their two most grounded laptop series, it tends to be hard to realize which is more fit to your requirements. We will begin with the consistently famous Thinkpad.

Lenovo ThinkPad compare with ideapad 


  • Impeccable plan and designing
  • Top notch console
  • HDMI and USB-A ports, as well as Thunderbolt 4
  • Accessible 4G or 5G portable broadband
  • Smart, disinfecting cordial Quick Clean capacity
  • Amazing battery duration


  • Costly
  • No OLED screen choice
  • No SD or microSD card space
  • A Matte-Black Classic

Organizations that up front investment mass get limits, however single-buy evaluating for the ThinkPad X1 Carbon is all around the guide. Lenovo records a base Core i5 model at $1,475. In the mean time, $2,197 is the second-most reduced value we saw as online for our test unit (model 20XW004DUS) with a Core i7-1165G7 processor, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB NVMe strong state drive, however different retailers have it for $2,500 and up, and when we took a stab at arranging one like it at Lenovo.com it came to $3,169 with a transitory coupon slicing it to $1,901. Whenever you look, the circumstance will probably be different still.

Lenovo gives you four screen decisions, all with IPS rather than intriguing OLED innovation and upheld by Intel's Iris Xe incorporated illustrations. Three have 1,920-by-1,200-pixel goal: our survey unit's 400-nit non-contact board, a touch screen with a similar splendor, and a 500-nit contact show with a PrivacyGuard channel (intended to keep carrier seatmates from sneaking around). The fourth is a 500-nit shiny board with 3,840-by-2,400-pixel goal. Lenovo says everything except the PrivacyGuard screen highlight decreased blue-light discharge to ease eye fatigue.

A somewhat greater battery makes the Gen 9 Carbon an ounce or two heavier than its ancestor at 2.49 pounds. Its matte-dark carbon-fiber and magnesium-compound skeleton (the high-res screen has a carbon-fiber weave top) has breezed through MIL-STD 810G torment assessments for shock, vibration, and ecological limits and measures 0.59 by 12.4 by 8.7 inches. That is very trim for a 14-inch laptop. The Dell Latitude 7420 is 0.68 by 12.7 by 8.2 inches and 2.7 pounds, however it's feasible to get trimmer at this screen size; the Asus ExpertBook B9450CEA is lighter at 0.59 by 12.6 by 8 inches and 2.2 pounds.

Some ultraportables like the XPS 13 and Apple MacBook Air M1 have just Thunderbolt 3 or 4 ports, obliging you to utilize a connector or dongle to connect an outside screen or USB Type-A drive. The ThinkPad embarrasses them: There are two Thunderbolt 4 ports on the left side, yet HDMI and USB-A 3.2 ports too, and a second USB-A port joins a sound jack and security lock opening on the right. Additionally not at all like the XPS 13, the Carbon offers discretionary 4G ($164) or 5G ($462) LTE for availability when there's no focal point for its Wi-Fi 6.

Show and Keyboard: Treats for Eyes and Fingers

The most recent X1 Carbon keeps its fairly well known illuminated console, with advantageous Home, End, Page Up, and Page Down keys and top-column order keys, including two to place and end brings in Microsoft Teams and Skype for Business. The Fn and Control keys are in one another's place at base left, yet on the off chance that you can't change you can trade them with the gave Lenovo Vantage programming. (Named "Business Vantage" in business frameworks, it unifies different equipment settings, framework updates, and Wi-Fi security.)

The console has a smart, marginally boisterous composing feel. Cursor racers can utilize either the TrackPoint small joystick at the crossing point of the G, H, and B keys or the touchpad (somewhat more extensive than Gen 8's), which has three agreeable fastens south of the space bar.

Is the 1,920-by-1,200-pixel screen the best we've looked at? No, on the grounds that we've seen high-goal OLED laptop presentations and HP DreamColor workstations, yet all at once it's excellent. Splendor is sufficient, and contrast is high; white foundations are Clorox-new, and colors are striking and very much soaked. Fine subtleties and the edges of letters are pleasingly sharp, and survey points are wide. The 16:10 angle proportion fits a touch more substance without letterboxing recordings as 3:2 presentations do. An antiglare covering works really hard of battling reflections.

The 720p webcam catches sensibly sufficiently bright and beautiful pictures with somewhat delicate concentration yet practically no commotion or static. Our test unit coming up short on discretionary face-acknowledgment webcam, which offers zero-contact logins through a vicinity sensor, yet there's a Windows Hello unique mark peruser coordinated with the power button over the console.

Lenovo says the new Carbon has better sound on account of speakers flanking the console in addition to two down-terminating woofers and Dolby Access programming that joins sound (with dynamic, music, film, and game presets), show, and voice upgrades. It's clearly to the point of occupying a gathering room, with a touch of blast or reverberation when turned up. Bass is repressed however recognizable, and you can make out covering tracks. The Windows 10 Pro framework is liberated from bloatware; the main extra I haven't referenced is Lenovo Quick Clean, which briefly locks the console and touchpad while you apply a disinfecting wipe.

Testing the Gen 9 Carbon: Clash of the Core i7s

For our benchmark outlines, I contrasted the ThinkPad X1 Carbon with two previously mentioned 14-inch business laptops (the Asus ExpertBook B9450CEA and the Dell Latitude 7420), in addition to two 13.4-inch ultraportables, the Dell XPS 13 and the Razer Blade 13. All with the exception of the Asus are Editors' Choice honor champs, and all have Intel's freshest "Tiger Lake" Core i7 CPUs. You can see their fundamental specs in the table beneath.

Efficiency and Media Tests

PCMark 10 and 8 are comprehensive execution suites created by the PC benchmark experts at UL (previously Futuremark). The PCMark 10 test we run reproduces different true efficiency and content-creation work processes. We use it to survey generally framework execution for office-driven assignments, for example, word handling, spreadsheeting, web perusing, and videoconferencing. PCMark 8, in the interim, has a capacity subtest that we use to survey the speed of the framework's boot drive. Both yield a restrictive numeric score; bigger numbers are better. (See more with regards to how we test laptops.)

Every one of the five laptops effectively cleared the 4,000 focuses that show great efficiency in PCMark 10, yet the Carbon drove the way; it's an eminent Microsoft Office or Google Workspace accomplice. The Lenovo was barely rearward in PCMark 8's stockpiling estimation, however you can overlook that-the benchmark originates before the present fast SSDs.

Next is Maxon's CPU-crunching Cinebench R15 test, which is completely strung to utilize all suitable processor centers and strings. Cinebench stresses the CPU rather than the GPU to deliver an intricate picture. The outcome is a restrictive score showing a PC's appropriateness for processor-escalated responsibilities.

For is frequently a decent indicator of our Handbrake video altering benchmark, in which we set a stopwatch on frameworks as they transcode a concise film from 4K goal down to 1080p. It, as well, is an extreme test for multi-center, multi-strung CPUs; lower times are better.

Notwithstanding having an ostensibly more slow processor than the Dells and Asus, the ThinkPad was the class of the field. It's no Core i9 or Xeon CAD or 3D delivering force to be reckoned with, yet it has a sizable amount of calculating cred for your hardest bookkeeping pages.

We likewise run a custom Adobe Photoshop picture altering benchmark. Utilizing a mid 2018 arrival of the Creative Cloud adaptation of Photoshop, we apply a progression of 10 complex channels and impacts to a standard JPEG test picture. We time every activity and include the aggregate (lower times are better). The Photoshop test focuses on the CPU, stockpiling subsystem, and RAM, however it can likewise exploit most GPUs to accelerate the method involved with applying channels.

Photoshop yielded a neck and neck finish a five-way tie. Imaging experts would presumably pick the XPS 13's 3.5K OLED screen, yet any of these frameworks can competently deal with a photograph assortment.

Designs Tests

3DMark estimates relative designs muscle by delivering groupings of exceptionally point by point, gaming-style 3D illustrations that stress particles and lighting. We run two different 3DMark subtests, Sky Diver and Fire Strike. Both are DirectX 11 benchmarks, yet Sky Diver is more fit to laptops and midrange PCs, while Fire Strike is seriously requesting and lets very good quality PCs and gaming rigs swagger their stuff.

Next up is another engineered designs test, this time from Unigine Corp. Like 3DMark, the Superposition test delivers and container through a point by point 3D scene, this one delivered in the eponymous Unigine motor briefly assessment on the machine's graphical ability. We present two Superposition results, run at the 720p Low and 1080p High presets and revealed in outlines each second (fps), showing how smooth the scene examines movement. For lower-end frameworks, keeping up with somewhere around 30fps is the sensible objective, while all the more impressive PCs ought to in a perfect world accomplish something like 60fps at the test goal.

The Razer was scarcely speedier than the others, yet none of these coordinated designs slimlines is in a similar ZIP code as a genuine gaming laptop with a discrete GPU. They're usefulness machines, appropriate for relaxed gaming and streaming media as opposed to fasting jerk shooters and esports titles. (See substantially more with regards to gaming execution with incorporated CPU designs in our profound jump testing highlight.)

Battery Rundown Test

After completely re-energizing the laptop, we set up the machine in power-save mode (rather than adjusted or elite execution mode) where accessible and make a couple of other battery-saving changes in anticipation of our turned off video summary test. (We likewise switch Wi-Fi off, placing the laptop into standalone mode.) In this test, we circle a video-a privately put away 720p record of the Blender Foundation short film Tears of SteelTears of Steel-with screen splendor set at half and volume at 100 percent until the framework stops.

The Dell ultraportable's high-res OLED show negatively affects its battery duration, however it actually shows good endurance. The others are even better, with the Lenovo outliving the Latitude by two hours to guarantee the crown. You won't have to go after its USB-C power connector even in the wake of a monotonous day at work or a cross-country plane ride.

Ideapad Compare With Lenovo Thinkpad


  • Extraordinary execution
  • USB-C port included
  • Solid undercarriage
  • Agreeable console and touchpad
  • Coordinated unique mark scanner
  • Clients can update RAM (notwithstanding copious advice to the contrary)


  • Dreary speakers
  • Dull presentation

Energetic Ryzen CPU on a Careful spending plan

Lenovo's IdeaPad line of laptops is similar to that of the Dell Inspiron or HP Pavilion series-midrange to low-end machines that run the range on value, size, and highlights. At around $500, the IdeaPad 3 14 sits serenely on the cusp of the two universes, flaunting an AMD Ryzen 5 5500U processor, 8GB of DDR4 RAM, and 256GB of SSD stockpiling. Our audit unit is accessible from Amazon.com with Windows 10 introduced, yet the retailer additionally offers a Windows 11 variation for $560.

Outside of the OS decision, there are no customization choices for this emphasis of the Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14. However, it's important that canny laptop clients can trade one of the two unsoldered 4GB RAM sticks for a 8GB RAM stick and knock the complete RAM to 12GB. Do this notwithstanding copious advice to the contrary, be that as it may, as it could disregard your guarantee.

The stock memory and capacity sums are on the low side-we like to see 16GB of RAM and 512GB of strong state stockpiling nowadays. Yet, the lower sums are standard the course for laptops of this value range, and the processor is the superstar here. AMD's Ryzen portable CPUs have become considerable chips as of late, and in spite of the 5500U being based on the more established AMD Zen 2 engineering, the silicon actually performs well and is an instructing beginning stage in the spending plan laptop market. (Profoundly, 12-string processor has a sizable amount of fuel in the tank for fundamental web and word processor needs, as well as tolerably complex undertakings, with practically no observable slack.

In the IdeaPad 3 14, this means champion execution, isolating it from a significant number of its rivals in a similar value section. (This is the way to pick the best laptop CPU.)

In any case, enough with regards to the inner parts the exterior are comparably significant. Spending plan laptops can frequently feel and look modest, with wobbly, plastic parts that cause the gadgets to feel more much the same as Leapfrogs than a modern laptop. (It's just plain obvious, for instance, the HP Stream 14.) Notably, the IdeaPad 3 14 evades the pattern and doesn't waver in such manner. Estimating in at 0.78 by 12.76 by 8.49 inches (HWD) and a little more than 3 pounds, it's a durable machine with a one of a kind blue completion that gives the laptop a smooth, eye-getting look. Indeed, it actually is plastic claiming to be metal, yet you could do a ton more regrettable in this office.

The IdeaPad 3 14 additionally makes some savvy wind current upgrades. Utilizing the Lenovo Vantage application, you can pick among three fan speeds that suit your presentation needs. The elastic grasps found under the laptop really give the laptop a slight wind current lift, since they hold the lower part of the skeleton back from sitting flush against your work area.

Spending plan Pricing, Modern Features

The 14-inch full HD screen is wrapped up between four limited sided bezels that offer some genuine screen land. The bezels are not quite so slender as those on, say, the XPG Xenia 14, however they're still bounty current looking. The IdeaPad 3 14 likewise includes an Eye Care mode, which changes the shading temperature of your presentation to sift through blue light, which can diminish weariness when you utilize your PC for quite a while. Settled at the highest point of the showcase, you'll track down a 720p webcam, complete with a security screen.

Whenever put to utilize, the IdeaPad 3 14 is one of the better financial plan laptops I've dealt with. The console is agreeable, with barely enough provide for make key presses fulfilling. The touchpad is responsive, and there's even a unique mark peruser coordinated into the power button. Sadly, the speakers, situated under the touchpad, aren't extraordinary. They aren't exceptionally clearly and radiate an empty sound. You're in an ideal situation utilizing earphones or an outside speaker.

Going to the ports, the IdeaPad 3 14 highlights a decent determination. On its right side, you'll observe a SD card opening and a USB 2.0 port.

Furthermore on the left side, you'll find a USB 3.0 Type-A port, a HDMI yield, a sound jack, and the power connector port. There's likewise an oval-molded USB-C port here, a state of the art jack that actually is definitely not a given on financial plan laptops. In the IdeaPad 3 14's case, it's restricted to information moves just and can't deal with video yield.

Financial plan laptops can be loaded with undesirable preinstalled programming known as bloatware, however the IdeaPad 3 14 is benevolently light on it. The typical guilty parties have arrived: Spotify, Disney Plus, McAfee Antivirus, and Alexa are only a portion of the applications occupying your valuable extra space, yet you can basically uninstall them on the off chance that you needn't bother with them.

Benchmarking the IdeaPad 3 14: Proficient Performance for the Bucks

So much for the IdeaPad 3 14's elements; how can it do in an immediate correlation with different laptops in its group? To discover, we acquired the Asus VivoBook S14, the Dell Inspiron 15 (3511), 2021's HP Pavilion x360 15, the pricier Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 13, and our past Editors' Choice pick for best spending plan laptop, the MSI Modern 14. While these machines all utilize an Intel processor-and-designs arrangement, they're in similar execution ballpark and offer comparative CPU and GPU arrangements.

The main benchmark test we run is PCMark 10, a test that reproduces an assortment of Windows projects to give a general exhibition score for office work processes. In this test, an outcome somewhere in the range of 4,000 and 5,000 focuses is an obvious sign of magnificent execution. While the vast majority of the pack falls solidly in the center, the IdeaPad 3 14 pulls from the pack and shows solid numbers.

We needed more information to add PCMark 10's Full System Drive stockpiling subtest, which estimates the program load time and the throughput of the laptop's boot drive. (That test doesn't run on some spending plan laptops because of inadequate RAM or an absence of extra room.) But the IdeaPad 3 14 had the option to run the test and scored 1,321 focuses not the best outcome we've seen for a SSD-prepared laptop, however in the spending plan laptop circle, all that anyone could need to run efficiency circles around the current organization.

The following test we run is video transcoding utilizing the HandBrake 1.4 application, which is an open-source device for changing over mixed media documents to various goals and configurations. Changing over video documents is a CPU-weighty assignment, so we don't anticipate much from financial plan laptops on this score, as they ordinarily utilize more vulnerable processors with less centers.

Presently, you most likely wouldn't do any genuine interactive media work on a careful spending plan laptop, yet in the event that you did, the IdeaPad 3 14 wouldn't be a terrible decision. In spite of the 10-minute fulfillment time, the IdeaPad 3 14 stands tall among the opposition on this test, with the VivoBook S14 at a far off second spot.

In light of CPU execution, we change to the Cinebench R23 benchmark, a multi-center test intended to practice a processor's centers in general and strings. The Ryzen 5 5500U's six centers prove to be useful here, as the IdeaPad 3 14 effectively outclasses its opposition.

Lastly, our efficiency tests find some conclusion with the Geekbench test, one more CPU stress test intended to recreate genuine exercises. The IdeaPad 3 14 scores good grades here, however scarcely. The Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 13 goes inside striking distance. In general, the IdeaPad 3 pounds the opposition in each efficiency test, yet what might be said about our designs benchmarks?

Each laptop in this correlation utilizes incorporated designs either Intel's fresher Iris Xe silicon, the standard Intel UHD Graphics found in many financial plan laptops, or in the IdeaPad 3 14's case, AMD's Radeon coordinated GPU. Designs benchmarks are now and again difficult to run on financial plan laptops, as some need more memory or a sufficient GPU.

To test the laptop's gaming execution, we run 3DMark, a designs test suite for Windows that contains a few subtests for various GPU capacities and programming APIs. We run two DirectX 12 tests specifically: 3DMark Night Raid and 3DMark Time Spy. Here's the place where the IdeaPad 3 vacillates a little, missing the mark behind the Asus Vivobook S14 and the Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 13. The higher the number, the better, be that as it may, and not a solitary laptop genuinely dazzles in this space beside the (a lot pricier) Galaxy Book Pro 13. That is valid for both the really intense Time Spy, and the unobtrusive Night Raid.

Our next benchmark is GFXBench 5.0, an illustrations test system that pressure tests both low-level and significant level schedules. We run two of its subtests, Aztec Ruins and Car Chase, delivered off-screen to oblige different showcase goals and make correlations legitimate. The IdeaPad 3 14 battled in the 1440p Aztec Ruins test, timing a normal of 23 casings each second (fps). It fared better in the 1080p Car Chase test, yet never held a predictable 60fps. In any case, with some setup changes, I envision it would be feasible to get a marginally higher edge rate assuming you're playing less-requesting games.

Strong Battery, So-So Display

To test laptop battery duration, we first energize the battery to 100 percent and afterward play a privately put away duplicate of the open-source Blender film Tears of Steel on a circle at half splendor and at 100 percent volume, alongside a couple of other battery-testing changes to guarantee precise readings across all gadgets. On the off chance that the laptop needs more space to store a duplicate, we'll play the film off of a drive. We additionally put the laptop into Airplane mode.

The IdeaPad 3 14 progressed admirably, tapping out following 10 hours and 32 minutes. A courageous exertion yet at the same time coming up short when contrasted and the Asus VivoBook S14, the HP Pavilion x360 15, and the Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 13.

The last preliminary in our benchmark glove comprises of show splendor and shading tests. Utilizing Datacolor's SpyderX Elite calibrator and its product apparatuses, we measure show execution, screen-brilliance yield levels, and measure range settings for the three most significant shading spaces for laptop clients: the sRGB, Adobe RGB, and DCI-P3 principles.

The IdeaPad 3 14's tones were by and large normal, standard the course for most financial plan laptops, however it was somewhat more terrible than the opposition (and a ton more awful than the Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 13's extraordinary AMOLED board). Screen splendor, then again, fared much better. On the off chance that it can't be brilliant, it ought to at minimum be splendid.

A Budget Baron

There is no such thing as a modest laptop without compromise, yet in spite of being sold at a financial plan value, the Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14 feels premium. Its smart presentation, solid form, and increments like a USB-C port, Wi-Fi 6, and a unique finger impression scanner assist the IdeaPad 3 with beating its opposition.

While it could in any case have a portion of the typical spending plan laptop inadequacies like unsuitable speakers and a dull showcase, the IdeaPad 3 14 is as yet worth the cost of confirmation and is one of the most mind-blowing modest journals you can purchase. It's our new Editors' Choice pick for financial plan laptops.

End (conclusion)

By and large, both the Lenovo Thinkpad and the Ideapad offer an incredible client experience - that is the motivation behind why they're adding to Lenovo's developing piece of the pie. For those searching for both of these models at a decent value, you can look at my rundown of £500 laptops which discusses the Thinkpad and the Ideapad in more detail.

While the Lenovo Thinkpad is certainly the better choice for business and work use, numerous relaxed clients have viewed it as strong enough for their necessities as well. In contrast with this, the Ideapad is better for regular clients who needn't bother with all that the Thinkpad offers. To peruse on the web, then, at that point, the less expensive Ideapad would be a superior decision.

Post a Comment

* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.